randomized controlled trials of antipsychotics for bipolar disorder

Advertisement

(Updated 6/14/05; note that placebo-controlled trials have been placed in the right column.)

Tohen M, Goldberg JF, Gonzalez-Pinto Arrillaga AM, Azorin JM, Vieta E, Hardy-Bayle MC, Lawson WB, Emsley RA, Zhang F, Baker RW, Risser RC, Namjoshi MA, Evans AR, Breier A.
 Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, Ind 46225, USA. m.tohen@lilly.com
A 12-week, double-blind comparison of olanzapine vs haloperidol in the treatment of acute mania.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Dec;60(12):1218-26.
"BACKGROUND: This randomized controlled trial compares the efficacy and safety of olanzapine vs haloperidol, as well as the quality of life of patients taking these drugs, in patients with bipolar mania. METHODS: The design consisted of 2 successive, 6-week, double-blind periods and compared flexible dosing of olanzapine (5-20 mg/d, n = 234) with haloperidol (3-15 mg/d, n = 219). RESULTS: Rates of remission (Young-Mania Rating Scale score of < or =12 and 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score of < or =8 at week 6) were similar for olanzapine- and haloperidol-treated patients (52.1% vs 46.1%, respectively; P =.15). For the subgroup of patients whose index episode did not include psychotic features, rates of remission were significantly greater for the olanzapine group compared with the haloperidol group (56.7% vs 41.6%, P =.04). Relapse into an affective episode (mania and/or depression) occurred in 13.1% and 14.8% of olanzapine- and haloperidol-treated patients, respectively (P =.56). Switch to depression occurred significantly more rapidly with haloperidol than with olanzapine when using survival analysis techniques (P =.04), and significantly more haloperidol-treated patients experienced worsening of extrapyramidal symptoms, as indicated by several measures. Weight gain was significantly greater in the olanzapine group compared with the haloperidol group (2.82 vs 0.02 kg, P<.001). The olanzapine group had significant improvement in quality of life on several dimensions compared with the haloperidol group. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that olanzapine does not differ from haloperidol in achieving overall remission of bipolar mania. However, haloperidol carries a higher rate of extrapyramidal symptoms, whereas olanzapine is associated with weight gain." [Abstract]

Shi L, Namjoshi MA, Zhang F, Gandhi G, Edgell ET, Tohen M, Breier A, Haro JM.
Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA. shi_lizheng@lilly.com
Olanzapine versus haloperidol in the treatment of acute mania: clinical outcomes, health-related quality of life and work status.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2002 Sep;17(5):227-37.
"We aimed to compare clinical outcomes, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and work status associated with olanzapine and haloperidol treatment in patients with bipolar disorder. This double-blind, randomized controlled trial, comparing flexible dosing of olanzapine (5-20 mg/day, n = 234) to haloperidol (3-15 mg/day, n = 219), consisted of a 6-week acute phase, followed by a 6-week continuation phase. Symptomatic remission rates were similar for olanzapine- and haloperidol-treated patients at weeks 6 and 12. At week 6, significant changes in five dimensions of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) [general health (P = 0.010), physical functioning (P < 0.001), role limitations due to physical problems (P < 0.001), social functioning (P < 0.05) and vitality (P < 0.01)] and the SF-36 physical components summary score were found in favour of olanzapine compared to haloperidol. At week 12, olanzapine treatment maintained the significantly favourable HRQOL changes. At the end of week 12, patients on olanzapine showed significantly greater improvement than haloperidol in work activities impairment and household activities impairment scores on the Streamlined Longitudinal Interview Clinical Evaluation from the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation (SLICE/LIFE) activities impairment scores. Subgroup analyses revealed that olanzapine treatment significantly increased a proportion of employed patients and their weekly paid working hours. In conclusion, compared to haloperidol, olanzapine treatment was comparably effective in the remission of bipolar mania and significantly improved HRQOL and work status in patients with bipolar I disorder." [Abstract]

Bahk WM, Shin YC, Woo JM, Yoon BH, Lee JS, Jon DI, Chung SK, Choi SK, Paik IH, Pae CU
Topiramate and divalproex in combination with risperidone for acute mania: a randomized open-label study.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2005 Jan;29(1):115-21.
Mood stabilizers and atypical antipsychotics are commonly combined for the treatment of bipolar mania. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and tolerability of topiramate and divalproex in combination with risperidone for treating acute mania patients in a naturalistic treatment setting. Seventy-four patients who met the DSM-IV criteria for bipolar mania were enrolled in this study. In order to assess the efficacy and the extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Clinical Global Impression (CGI) and Simpson-Angus Rating Scale (SARS) were measured at the baseline and at weeks 1, 3 and 6. From the baseline to the endpoint, the YMRS and CGI scores were reduced by 67.9% and 56.6% in the topiramate plus risperidone group (TPMG). The YMRS and CGI scores were also reduced by 63.7% and 58.2% in the divalproex plus risperidone group (DVPG). The weight and body mass index (BMI) increased significantly by 3.6% and 3.3% from the baseline to the endpoint in the DVPG, while they decreased by 0.5% and 0.4%, respectively, with no significant difference in the TPMG. There were no serious adverse events in either group. Despite the methodological limitations, topiramate was effective and tolerable for treating acute mania and may also be a promising alternative to a weight-gain liable mood stabilizer (MS) such as divalproex. [Abstract]

Segal J, Berk M, Brook S.
Department of Psychiatry, University of the Witwatersrand Medical School, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Risperidone compared with both lithium and haloperidol in mania: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Clin Neuropharmacol. 1998 May-Jun;21(3):176-80.
"Case reports and studies of other neuroleptics suggest the efficacy of risperidone in the treatment of mania. Forty-five inpatients with DSM-IV mania were studied in a 28-day randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of either 6 mg daily of risperidone, 10 mg daily of haloperidol, or 800 to 1200 mg daily of lithium. The patients in all three groups showed a similar improvement on the total score for all rating scales at day 28 (Brief Psychiatric rating scale; lithium 9.1, haloperidol 4.9, risperidone 6.5, F = 1.01, df = 2, p = 0.37; Mania rating scale; lithium 15.7, haloperidol 10.2, risperidone 12.4, F = 1.07, df = 2, p = 0.35 [analysis of variance]). The Global Assessment of Functioning and Clinical Global Impression data showed a similar pattern of improvement. This study suggests that risperidone is of equivalent efficacy to lithium and haloperidol in the management of acute mania. The extrapyramidal side effects of risperidone and haloperidol were not significantly different." [Abstract]

McElroy SL, Keck PE, Stanton SP, Tugrul KC, Bennett JA, Strakowski SM.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Ohio, 45267, USA.
A randomized comparison of divalproex oral loading versus haloperidol in the initial treatment of acute psychotic mania.
J Clin Psychiatry. 1996 Apr;57(4):142-6.
"BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled evidence suggests that divalproex administered via the oral loading strategy of 20 mg/kg/day may produce clinically significant antimanic response within 3 days of treatment in some patients. We conducted a prospective study to compare the antimanic response of divalproex oral loading with that of haloperidol in the initial treatment of acute psychotic mania. METHOD: After a < or = 1-day screening period, 36 consecutive hospitalized patients with bipolar disorder, manic or mixed phase and with psychotic features, were randomly assigned to receive either divalproex 20 mg/kg/day or haloperidol 0.2 mg/kg/day for 6 full days, without other psychotropic agents except lorazepam up to 4 mg/day for management of agitation. Serum valproate concentrations were measured after 1 day of treatment. Response was measured daily by a blind rater using the Young Mania Rating Scale and the Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms. RESULTS: Divalproex oral loading and haloperidol were equally effective in acutely reducing manic and psychotic symptoms. The greatest rate of improvement for both drug regimens occurred over the first 3 full days of treatment. Side effects were infrequent and minor for both treatments, except for extrapyramidal side effects which were significantly more common with haloperidol. CONCLUSION: Divalproex oral loading may produce rapid onset of antimanic and antipsychotic response comparable to that of haloperidol and with minimal side effects in the initial treatment of acute psychotic mania in a subset of bipolar patients." [Abstract]

Small JG, Klapper MH, Marhenke JD, Milstein V, Woodham GC, Kellams JJ.
Indiana University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Larue D. Carter Memorial Hospital, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Lithium combined with carbamazepine or haloperidol in the treatment of mania.
Psychopharmacol Bull. 1995;31(2):265-72.
"Hospitalized manic patients were withdrawn from psychoactive medications for 2 weeks after which they were randomized to double-blind treatment with carbamazepine plus lithium [CBZ-Li] or haloperidol plus lithium [HAL-Li] with benztropine. Unit dosages of Li 300 mg, CBZ 200 mg and HAL 2 mg were titrated to therapeutic plasma levels and maintained for 8 weeks. No rescue medications were permitted after 3 weeks. Standard ratings of psychopathology and side effects were accomplished weekly. Sixty patients entered the study but only 33 remained for randomization after drug washout. By 8 weeks both groups were improved from baseline without statistically reliable differences between them. However HAL-Li patients had more extrapyramidal side effects that were major reasons for dropout, whereas CBZ-Li patients were more often noncompliant and initially required more rescue medications. We conclude that either combination treatment can be beneficial but CBZ-Li has the advantage because of fewer neurologic side effects." [Abstract]

Suppes T, Webb A, Paul B, Carmody T, Kraemer H, Rush AJ.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75235-9070, USA.
Clinical outcome in a randomized 1-year trial of clozapine versus treatment as usual for patients with treatment-resistant illness and a history of mania.
Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Aug;156(8):1164-9.
"OBJECTIVE: Case series and follow-up studies suggest that clozapine may have mood-stabilizing properties in addition to antipsychotic action in patients with schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, and bipolar I disorder, but the generalizability of these findings is limited. This article describes a randomized, open study of clozapine add-on therapy versus treatment as usual for patients with treatment-resistant illness and a history of mania. METHOD: Thirty-eight patients meeting the DSM-IV criteria for schizoaffective or bipolar disorder that was deemed treatment-resistant were randomly assigned to clozapine add-on treatment (N = 19) or treatment as usual (no clozapine) (N = 19) and followed up for 1 year. Patients received monthly ratings on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impression scale, Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Scale, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale, and a 40-item side effect checklist. Differences between treatment groups were assessed according to a pattern-mix random-regression model. An additional analysis compared group differences in rating scale scores against relative time in the study. RESULTS: Significant between-group differences were found in scores on all rating scales except the Hamilton depression scale. Total medication use over 1 year significantly decreased in the clozapine group. No significant differences between groups in somatic complaints were noted. The subjects with nonpsychotic bipolar I disorder who received clozapine showed a degree of improvement similar to that of the entire clozapine-treated group. Clozapine dose was significantly higher for the patients with schizoaffective illness than for those with bipolar disorder. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support clozapine's independent mood-stabilizing property. They demonstrate that clozapine use was associated with significant clinical improvement relative to treatment as usual." [Abstract]

Barbini B, Scherillo P, Benedetti F, Crespi G, Colombo C, Smeraldi E.
I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Scientifico Ospedale San Raffaele, Department of Neuropsychiatric Sciences, University of Milan, School of Medicine, Italy.
Response to clozapine in acute mania is more rapid than that of chlorpromazine.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1997 Mar;12(2):109-12.
"The purpose of the present study was to compare the efficacy of clozapine with that of chlorpromazine in an open label manner (both given in association with lithium salts) in the treatment of acute mania. Thirty hospitalized manic patients were entered into the study. All patients met DSM-IV criteria for bipolar disorder, Manic Episode; 27 patients completed the study and three patients dropped for noncompliance. The duration of the study was 3 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned to two treatment groups; group 1 (n = 15) was treated with clozapine at a mean dose of 166 mg/day and group 2 (n = 12) was treated with chlorpromazine at a mean dose of 310 mg/day. Manic symptomatology was rated on Young Rating Scale for Mania (YRSM) each week; side effects were recorded on dosage records and treatment emergent symptoms; extrapyramidal acute side effects were rated on the Simpson-Angus Rating Scale performed at the beginning of the study and after 3 weeks of treatment. A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance on YRMS scores showed a significant time effect (p < 0.0001) and a significant time-group interaction (p < 0.0001). Post-hoc comparison between the two groups showed a significant difference after 2 weeks of treatment (p = 0.0001), with clozapine treated patients showing lower YRSM scores than chlorpromazine treated patients. YRSM scores at the end of the study were not significantly different. Patients treated with clozapine showed a more rapid trend toward amelioration. No clinically relevant side effect was observed during the study." [Abstract]

Sikdar S, Kulhara P, Avasthi A, Singh H.
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Combined chlorpromazine and electroconvulsive therapy in mania.
Br J Psychiatry. 1994 Jun;164(6):806-10.
"We report the efficacy of combined chlorpromazine and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in the treatment of mania. Two groups of 15 manic patients received eight ECT sessions either actual or simulated, in a double-blind, controlled study. All patients also received 600 mg of chlorpromazine daily until the sixth session. Results indicate that the group receiving the combination of chlorpromazine and ECT did significantly better than the other group." [Abstract]

Keck PE Jr, Marcus R, Tourkodimitris S, Ali M, Liebeskind A, Saha A, Ingenito G; Aripiprazole Study Group.
Biological Psychiatry Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, PO Box 670559, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0559, USA. paul.keck@uc.edu
A placebo-controlled, double-blind study of the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole in patients with acute bipolar mania.
Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Sep;160(9):1651-8.
"OBJECTIVE: The authors compared the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole, a novel antipsychotic, to placebo for treatment of patients in an acute manic or mixed episode of bipolar disorder. METHOD: This 3-week, multicenter, double-blind study randomly assigned 262 bipolar disorder patients in an acute manic or mixed episode to aripiprazole, 30 mg/day (reduced to 15 mg/day if needed for tolerability), or placebo. Patients remained hospitalized for at least 2 of the weeks. The primary efficacy measure was mean change from baseline in total score on the Young Mania Rating Scale; response was defined as a decrease in score of > or =50%. RESULTS: Aripiprazole produced statistically significant mean improvements in total score on the Young Mania Rating Scale compared with placebo (-8.2 versus -3.4, respectively) and produced a significantly higher response rate (40% versus 19%). For key efficacy variables (response per Young Mania Rating Scale; Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version scores for severity of illness [mania] and change from preceding phase [mania]), aripiprazole separated from placebo by day 4. The completion rate was significantly higher with aripiprazole than with placebo (42% versus 21%). Discontinuations due to adverse events did not differ significantly between the aripiprazole and placebo groups. There were no significant changes in body weight versus placebo, and aripiprazole was not associated with elevated serum prolactin or QTc prolongation. CONCLUSIONS: Aripiprazole had significantly greater efficacy than placebo for the treatment of bipolar disorder patients in acute manic or mixed episodes and was safe and well tolerated in this randomized controlled trial." [Abstract]

Keck PE Jr, Versiani M, Potkin S, West SA, Giller E, Ice K; Ziprasidone in Mania Study Group.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, OH 45627-0559, USA. keckpe@email.uc.edu
Ziprasidone in the treatment of acute bipolar mania: a three-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial.
Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Apr;160(4):741-8.
"OBJECTIVE: The study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of ziprasidone, compared with placebo, in the treatment of adult patients with acute bipolar mania. METHOD: Patients with a primary DSM-IV diagnosis of bipolar I disorder and a current manic or mixed episode (confirmed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, Patient Edition) (N=210) were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to 3 weeks of double-blind treatment with ziprasidone (40-80 mg twice daily) or placebo. Efficacy was assessed with the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia, Change Version (which contains the Mania Rating Scale), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Clinical Global Impression (CGI) severity scale, CGI improvement scale, and Global Assessment of Functioning Scale. Primary efficacy variables were differences from baseline to endpoint (last observation carried forward) in mean Mania Rating Scale and CGI severity scale scores between the ziprasidone and placebo groups. Safety evaluations included monitoring of adverse events, vital signs, electrocardiogram results, and clinical laboratory values and assessment of movement disorders and akathisia. RESULTS: Ziprasidone produced rapid, sustained improvements relative to baseline and placebo on all primary and most secondary efficacy measures at endpoint. Significant improvements were typically observed within 2 days after treatment commenced and were maintained throughout the 3 weeks. Ziprasidone was well tolerated and associated with a low rate of extrapyramidal symptoms; neither weight gain nor clinically significant changes in vital signs or other safety parameters were observed with ziprasidone. CONCLUSIONS: Ziprasidone monotherapy was significantly superior to placebo in reducing symptoms of acute mania in patients with bipolar I disorder. Onset of action was rapid, and tolerability of ziprasidone was generally comparable to that of placebo." [Abstract]

Smulevich AB, Khanna S, Eerdekens M, Karcher K, Kramer M, Grossman F
Acute and continuation risperidone monotherapy in bipolar mania: a 3-week placebo-controlled trial followed by a 9-week double-blind trial of risperidone and haloperidol.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2005 Jan;15(1):75-84.
In a randomized, double-blind trial, patients with acute bipolar mania received 1-6 mg/day of risperidone, 2-12 mg/day of haloperidol, or placebo for 3 weeks, followed by double-blind risperidone or haloperidol for 9 weeks. Of 438 patients, 154 were randomized to risperidone, 144 to haloperidol, and 140 to placebo. The mean+/-S.D. modal doses were 4.2+/-1.7 mg/day of risperidone and 8.0+/-3.6 mg/day of haloperidol during the initial 3-week phase and 4.1+/-1.8 and 7.4+/-3.7 mg/day during the 12-week period. At week 3, mean Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score reductions from baseline were significantly greater in patients receiving risperidone than placebo (p<0.001). Differences between risperidone and haloperidol on this efficacy measure were not significant. Further reductions in YMRS scores were seen in patients receiving risperidone or haloperidol during the subsequent 9 weeks. No unexpected adverse events were reported. Extrapyramidal disorder and hyperkinesias, the most commonly reported adverse events with antipsychotic use, occurred less frequently with risperidone than haloperidol. We conclude that risperidone monotherapy was an effective and well-tolerated treatment for bipolar mania and that efficacy was maintained over the long term. [Abstract]

Shelton RC, Stahl SM
Risperidone and paroxetine given singly and in combination for bipolar depression.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Dec;65(12):1715-9.
BACKGROUND: Bipolar depression is a major clinical problem that remains under-researched. The current study was intended to evaluate the effects of the novel antipsychotic risperidone, the selective serotonin reup-take inhibitor (SSRI) paroxetine, and the combination in patients with bipolar disorder. METHOD: Thirty patients with DSM-IV bipolar (I or II) disorder, depressed phase, who were receiving a stable dose of a mood stabilizer were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with risperidone (plus placebo), paroxetine (plus placebo), or the combination of risperidone and paroxetine. Data were gathered from August 1999 to September 2001. RESULTS: All 3 groups experienced significant reductions in depression ratings from baseline to endpoint; there were no significant differences in outcome between groups. There were statistically significant differences in paroxetine dose contrasting paroxetine plus placebo against the combined condition. The switch rate into mania or hypomania was very low, with only 1 patient in the paroxetine plus placebo condition experiencing mild hypomania. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that risperidone, paroxetine, and the combination of risperidone and paroxetine are equally but modestly effective when added to a mood stabilizer in bipolar depression. The paroxetine dose differed between groups, possibly because of drug-drug interactions. Using another SSRI in the combined condition could have produced a more robust effect and should be tested. [Abstract]

Hirschfeld RM, Keck PE Jr, Kramer M, Karcher K, Canuso C, Eerdekens M, Grossman F.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA.
Rapid antimanic effect of risperidone monotherapy: a 3-week multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Jun;161(6):1057-65.
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of risperidone monotherapy in the treatment of acute bipolar mania. METHOD: Patients with DSM-IV bipolar I disorder experiencing an acute manic episode (baseline Young Mania Rating Scale score >/==" BORDER="0">20) were randomly assigned to 3 weeks of treatment with risperidone (flexible dose: 1-6 mg/day) or placebo. The primary efficacy measure was the mean baseline-to-endpoint change in total score on the Young Mania Rating Scale. Secondary efficacy measures included the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) severity rating and scores on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, and Global Assessment Scale (GAS). Safety assessments consisted of monitoring adverse events, vital signs, electrocardiogram and laboratory results, and scores on the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale. RESULTS: Subjects (N=259) received treatment with either risperidone (N=134) or placebo (N=125). The mean modal dose of risperidone was 4.1 mg/day. Improvement in mean Young Mania Rating Scale total score (adjusted for covariates) was significantly greater in the risperidone than in the placebo group at endpoint (mean change=-10.6 [SD=9.5] versus -4.8 [SD=9.5], respectively), with significant between-group differences seen as early as 3 days after start of treatment (change with risperidone: mean=-6.8 [SD=5.8]; change with placebo: mean=-4.0 [SD=5.8]) and continuing throughout all time points. Improvements in CGI severity ratings and scores on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, and GAS were also significantly greater among patients receiving risperidone than those given placebo. The most common adverse event reported among risperidone patients was somnolence. While Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale scores were significantly greater in patients receiving risperidone, mean total and subscale scores were low. CONCLUSIONS: Risperidone monotherapy was significantly more efficacious than placebo in the treatment of acute mania and demonstrated a rapid onset of action. Risperidone was well tolerated by patients in this study. [Abstract]

Bowden CL, Myers JE, Grossman F, Xie Y.
University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA.
Risperidone in combination with mood stabilizers: a 10-week continuation phase study in bipolar I disorder.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 May;65(5):707-14.
BACKGROUND: Combination therapy (risperidone and a mood stabilizer) for patients with a history of bipolar disorder (DSM-IV) and hospitalized for treatment of a manic episode was assessed in a 13-week study. METHOD: Subjects received flexible doses of a mood stabilizer (lithium or divalproex) plus placebo, risperidone, or haloperidol in a 3-week double-blind study. They could then enter a 10-week open-label study during which they received risperidone combined with a mood stabilizer. RESULTS: Of the 156 patients enrolled in the 3-week study, 85 entered the 10-week open-label extension, of whom 48 completed 10 weeks of treatment. The mean +/- SE doses of risperidone were 3.8 +/- 0.3 mg/day during the 3-week study and 3.1 +/- 0.2 mg/day during the 10-week study. At double-blind endpoint, mean reductions in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) scores were significantly greater in patients receiving risperidone plus mood stabilizer than in those receiving placebo plus mood stabilizer (-14.3 vs. -8.2, p <.001). Further significant (p <.001) reductions were seen during the 10 weeks of treatment with risperidone plus mood stabilizer. Symptom remission (YMRS score <or= 12) was seen in 38 patients (79%) at the end of the 10-week study. Scores on the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, and Clinical Global Impressions scale improved significantly (p <.05) during both the 3-week and 10-week studies. Treatment was well tolerated, and modest weight gain was observed during the 13-week study period. CONCLUSION: The combination of risperidone and a mood stabilizer was efficacious and well tolerated in the continuation treatment of patients initially hospitalized for the management of an acute manic episode. [Abstract]

Yatham LN, Grossman F, Augustyns I, Vieta E, Ravindran A.
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. yatham@interchange.ubc.ca
Mood stabilisers plus risperidone or placebo in the treatment of acute mania. International, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.
Br J Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;182:141-7.
"BACKGROUND: Few double-blind trials have examined the efficacy of a combination of a mood stabiliser and an atypical antipsychotic in acute mania. AIMS: To determine the efficacy of risperidone in combination with a mood stabiliser in acute mania. METHOD: Patients taking a mood stabiliser were randomised to 3 weeks' treatment with risperidone (n=75) or placebo (n=76). RESULTS: Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) scores improved rapidly with significantly greater reductions at week 1 in the risperidone group compared with the placebo group. At end-point YMRS scores decreased by 14.5 and 10.3 points in the risperidone and placebo groups, respectively. Significant improvements v. placebo (P<0.05) were noted in the risperidone group on several other clinically meaningful measures. Additionally, a post hoc analysis excluding carbamazepine-treated patients (plasma concentrations of risperidone active moiety were 40% lower in this group) revealed significantly greater reductions (P=0.047) in YMRS scores in the risperidone group than in the placebo group. Incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Risperidone is superior to placebo when used in combination with lithium or divalproex in acute mania." [Abstract]

Sachs GS, Grossman F, Ghaemi SN, Okamoto A, Bowden CL.
Bipolar Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, 50 Staniford Street, Suite 580, Boston, MA 02114, USA. sachsg@aol.com
Combination of a mood stabilizer with risperidone or haloperidol for treatment of acute mania: a double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of efficacy and safety.
Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Jul;159(7):1146-54.
"OBJECTIVE: The study assessed the efficacy and safety of risperidone as an adjunctive agent to mood stabilizers in the treatment of acute mania. METHOD: This 3-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study included 156 bipolar disorder patients with a current manic or mixed episode who received a mood stabilizer (lithium or divalproex) and placebo, risperidone, or haloperidol. The primary efficacy measure was the Young Mania Rating Scale. Other assessments used the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, the Clinical Global Impression scale, and safety measures. RESULTS: The trial was discontinued by 25 (49%) of the 51 placebo group patients, 18 (35%) of the 52 risperidone group patients, and 28 (53%) of the 53 haloperidol group patients. Mean modal doses were 3.8 mg/day (SD=1.8) of risperidone and 6.2 mg/day (SD=2.9) of haloperidol. Significantly greater reductions in Young Mania Rating Scale scores at endpoint and over time were seen in the risperidone group and in the haloperidol group, compared with the placebo group. Young Mania Rating Scale total scores improved with risperidone and with haloperidol both in patients with psychotic features and in those without psychotic features at baseline. Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale total scores at endpoint were significantly higher in the haloperidol patients than in the placebo patients. Antiparkinsonian medications were received by 8%, 17%, and 38% of patients in the placebo, risperidone, and haloperidol groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Risperidone plus a mood stabilizer was more efficacious than a mood stabilizer alone, and as efficacious as haloperidol plus a mood stabilizer, for the rapid control of manic symptoms and was well tolerated." [Abstract]

Bowden CL, Grunze H, Mullen J, Brecher M, Paulsson B, Jones M, Vågerö M, Svensson K
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled efficacy and safety study of quetiapine or lithium as monotherapy for mania in bipolar disorder.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2005 Jan;66(1):111-21.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine monotherapy versus placebo for the treatment of mania associated with bipolar disorder. METHOD: In an international, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, 12-week study, patients with a DSM-IV diagnosis of bipolar I disorder (manic episode) were randomly assigned to treatment with quetiapine (flexibly dosed up to 800 mg/day), placebo, or lithium. The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score at day 21. Data were gathered from April 2001 to May 2002. RESULTS: More patients in the quetiapine (72/107) and lithium (67/98) groups completed the study compared with the placebo group (35/97). Improvement (reduction) in YMRS score was significantly greater for quetiapine than placebo at day 7 (-8.03 vs. -4.89; p < .01), and the difference between groups continued to increase over time to day 21 (-14.6 vs. -6.7; p < .001) and to endpoint at day 84 (-20.3 vs. -9.0; p < .001). Significantly more quetiapine patients compared with placebo patients fulfilled YMRS response criteria at day 21 (53.3% vs. 27.4%; p < .001) and at day 84 (72.0% vs. 41.1%; p < .001). Quetiapine was also superior to placebo in efficacy at day 21 and day 84 by all secondary measures. Lithium-treated patients improved significantly compared with placebo patients and similarly to quetiapine-treated patients on the primary efficacy measure. The most common adverse events for quetiapine were dry mouth, somnolence, and weight gain, while lithium was associated with tremor and insomnia. The quetiapine and placebo groups had similar, low levels of extrapyramidal symptom-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Quetiapine demonstrated superior efficacy to placebo in patients with bipolar mania and was well tolerated. [Abstract]

Sachs G, Chengappa KN, Suppes T, Mullen JA, Brecher M, Devine NA, Sweitzer DE.
Harvard Bipolar Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, 02114, USA.
Quetiapine with lithium or divalproex for the treatment of bipolar mania: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Bipolar Disord. 2004 Jun;6(3):213-23.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine (QTP) combined with lithium (Li) or divalproex (DVP) in the treatment of acute mania. METHODS: Patients were randomized to 21 days of double-blind treatment with QTP plus Li/DVP, or placebo (PBO) plus Li/DVP. QTP was rapidly dosed up to a maximum of 800 mg/day; Li was dosed to 0.7-1.0 mEq/L; or DVP to 50-100 microg/mL. RESULTS: Fifty-six of 91 (61.5%) individuals in the QTP + Li/DVP group compared with 49 of 100 (49%) taking PBO + Li/DVP completed the study. A significantly greater mean reduction in total Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score was observed at end-point in patients receiving QTP + Li/DVP compared with those in the PBO + Li/DVP group (-13.76 versus -9.93; p = 0.021). The response rate (> or =50% YMRS improvement) was significantly higher in the QTP + Li/DVP group than in PBO + Li/DVP-treated patients (54.3% versus 32.6%; p = 0.005), as was the proportion of patients achieving clinical remission (YMRS < 12) (45.7% versus 25.8%; p = 0.007). Patients receiving QTP + Li/DVP also had a significantly greater improvement in Clinical Global Impressions-Bipolar (CGI-BP) Severity of Illness scores (-1.38 versus -0.78; p = 0.001). The mean last-week dose of QTP was 584 mg/day in patients meeting response criteria. Common adverse events (at least 10% and twice the rate of Li/DVP) in the QTP + Li/DVP group included somnolence, dry mouth, asthenia, and postural hypotension. CONCLUSIONS: Quetiapine combined with either Li or DVP has superior efficacy compared with Li or DVP monotherapy for treating patients with bipolar mania. Combination therapy was well-tolerated and most adverse events were mild, withdrawal because of adverse events being only 5% compared with 6% on Li or DVP monotherapy. [Abstract]

Delbello MP, Schwiers ML, Rosenberg HL, Strakowski SM.
Bipolar and Psychotic Disorders Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0559, USA. delbelmp@email.uc.edu
A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of quetiapine as adjunctive treatment for adolescent mania.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002 Oct;41(10):1216-23.
"OBJECTIVES: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study examined the efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine in combination with divalproex (DVP) for acute mania in adolescents with bipolar disorder. It was hypothesized that DVP in combination with quetiapine would be more effective than DVP alone for treating mania associated with adolescent bipolar disorder. Furthermore, it was hypothesized that quetiapine would be well tolerated. METHOD: Thirty manic or mixed bipolar I adolescents (12-18 years) received an initial DVP dose of 20 mg/kg and were randomly assigned to 6 weeks of combination therapy with quetiapine, which was titrated to 450 mg/day (n = 15) or placebo (n = 15). Primary efficacy measures were change from baseline to endpoint in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score and YMRS response rate. Safety and tolerability were assessed weekly. RESULTS: The DVP + quetiapine group demonstrated a statistically significantly greater reduction in YMRS scores from baseline to endpoint than the DVP + placebo group (F(1,27) = 5.04, p =.03). Moreover, YMRS response rate was significantly greater in the DVP + quetiapine group than in the DVP + placebo group (87% versus 53%; Fisher exact test, p =.05). No significant group differences from baseline to endpoint in safety measures were noted. Sedation, rated as mild or moderate, was significantly more common in the DVP + quetiapine group than in the DVP + placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study indicate that quetiapine in combination with DVP is more effective for the treatment of adolescent bipolar mania than DVP alone. In addition, the results suggest that quetiapine is well tolerated when used in combination with DVP for the treatment of mania." [Abstract]

Chou JC, Czobor P, Charles O, Tuma I, Winsberg B, Allen MH, Trujillo M, Volavka J.
Nathan Kline Institute, Orangeburg, New York 10962, USA. chou@nki.rfmh.org
Acute mania: haloperidol dose and augmentation with lithium or lorazepam.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1999 Dec;19(6):500-5.
"Antipsychotic dosing for acute mania has not been well studied. Combined treatment with lithium and an antipsychotic is the most common treatment, but additional antimanic efficacy of a lithium-antipsychotic combination beyond that of an antipsychotic alone has not been well demonstrated. Furthermore, the possibility that lithium could affect antipsychotic dose requirement is believed to have never been studied. In this study, 63 acutely psychotic bipolar manic inpatients were randomly assigned to receive double-blind treatment with 1 of 2 haloperidol doses, 25 mg/day or 5 mg/day, for 21 days. In addition to haloperidol, subjects were randomly assigned to receive concomitant treatment with placebo, standard lithium, or lorazepam 4 mg/day. The high haloperidol dose produced greater improvement and more side effects than did the low dose. Lithium added to the low dose produced a markedly greater clinical response than did the low dose alone. Lorazepam did not improve the outcome for the patients receiving low-dose haloperidol. The clinical response produced by high-dose haloperidol was not enhanced by adding either lithium or lorazepam. All treatment effects emerged by the fourth day of treatment and persisted. Used alone, a haloperidol dose of 5 mg/day is too low for most manic patients, but concomitant lithium produces a dose-dependent enhancement of haloperidol response. Lorazepam 4 mg/day was insufficient to produce an advantage when added to low-dose haloperidol." [Abstract]

Zarate CA Jr, Tohen M.
Consolidated Department of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Belmont, Mass, USA. zaratec@intra.nimh.nih.gov
Double-blind comparison of the continued use of antipsychotic treatment versus its discontinuation in remitted manic patients.
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;161(1):169-71.
"OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine the benefits of the continued use of a typical antipsychotic agent following remission from an acute manic episode. METHOD: Immediately following remission of a manic episode treated with the combination of a typical antipsychotic (perphenazine) and a mood stabilizer (lithium, carbamazepine, or valproate), 37 patients were randomly assigned to 6 months of double-blind treatment in which in addition to the mood stabilizer they received either continued perphenazine treatment or placebo. RESULTS: Patients randomly assigned to continue perphenazine treatment, relative to those who discontinued it, were more likely to have a shorter time to depressive relapse, discontinue the study, and have increased rates of dysphoria, depressive symptoms, and extrapyramidal symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: There were no short-term benefits with the continued use of a typical antipsychotic after achieving remission from an episode of acute mania. In fact, its continued use was associated with detrimental effects." [Abstract]

->Back to Home<-


Recent Antipsychotic RCT Results

1) Maina G, Albert U, Rosso G, Bogetto F
Olanzapine or lamotrigine addition to lithium in remitted bipolar disorder patients with anxiety disorder comorbidity: a randomized, single-blind, pilot study.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;69(4):609-16.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present randomized, single-blind, pilot study was to assess the efficacy of the addition of a second mood stabilizer, either olanzapine or lamotrigine, to lithium in patients with remitted bipolar disorder and comorbid anxiety disorder. METHOD: Adult DSM-IV bipolar disorder patients with a current anxiety disorder and a Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) score of 12 or higher, in remission from an affective episode for at least 2 months while on lithium maintenance treatment, were randomly assigned to receive 12 weeks of single-blind olanzapine 5 to 10 mg/day (N = 24) or lamotrigine 50 to 200 mg/day (N = 23) addition to lithium. The primary outcome measure was the HAM-A; secondary outcome measures were the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale. Data were collected from July 2005 to February 2007. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients in the olanzapine and 18 in the lamotrigine group completed the trial. Mean +/- SD final doses of olanzapine and lamotrigine were, respectively, 7.7 +/- 4.2 mg/day and 96.7 +/- 46.7 mg/day in the intent-to-treat sample (N = 47). Both olanzapine and lamotrigine were effective in reducing HAM-A scores from baseline to endpoint (paired t test for completers: t = 11.361, df = 21, p < .001 for olanzapine and t = 6.301, df = 17, p < .001 for lamotrigine). Both drugs were also effective on the secondary outcome measures. Olanzapine was more effective than lamotrigine at weeks 6 and 12 with a last-observation-carried-forward analysis on all 3 outcome measures, while such differences disappeared on the HAM-A and GAF at week 12 with the visit-wise analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a second mood stabilizer (olanzapine or lamotrigine) to lithium is effective in reducing anxiety symptoms in bipolar disorder patients with a co-occurring anxiety disorder. [PubMed Citation] [Order full text from Infotrieve]

2) Calabrese JR, Huffman RF, White RL, Edwards S, Thompson TR, Ascher JA, Monaghan ET, Leadbetter RA
Lamotrigine in the acute treatment of bipolar depression: results of five double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials.
Bipolar Disord. 2008 Mar;10(2):323-33.
OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of lamotrigine as maintenance treatment for bipolar disorder (BD), particularly for delaying depressive episodes, is well established, but its efficacy in the acute treatment of bipolar depression is less clear. This paper reports the results of five randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of lamotrigine monotherapy for the acute treatment of bipolar depression. METHODS: Adult subjects with bipolar I or II disorder experiencing a depressive episode were randomized to placebo or lamotrigine monotherapy (after titration, at a fixed dose of 50 mg or 200 mg daily in Study 1; a flexible dose of 100-400 mg daily in Study 2; or a fixed dose of 200 mg daily in Studies 3, 4 and 5) for 7-10 weeks. RESULTS: Lamotrigine did not differ significantly from placebo on primary efficacy endpoints [17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale in Studies 1 and 2; Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) in Studies 3, 4 and 5]. In Study 1, lamotrigine significantly separated from placebo on some secondary measures of efficacy, including the MADRS, the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) and the CGI-Improvement (CGI-I), but seldom differed on secondary efficacy endpoints for the other studies. CONCLUSIONS: Lamotrigine monotherapy did not demonstrate efficacy in the acute treatment of bipolar depression in four out of five placebo-controlled clinical studies. Lamotrigine was well tolerated in the acute treatment of bipolar depression. [PubMed Citation] [Order full text from Infotrieve]

3) Pascual JC, Soler J, Puigdemont D, Pérez-Egea R, Tiana T, Alvarez E, Pérez V
Ziprasidone in the treatment of borderline personality disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Apr;69(4):603-8.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of ziprasidone in the treatment of adult patients with borderline personality disorder. METHOD: Sixty DSM-IV borderline personality disorder patients were included from March 2004 to April 2006 in a 12-week, single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The subjects were randomly assigned to ziprasidone or placebo in a 1:1 ratio following a 2-week baseline period. The Clinical Global Impressions scale for use in borderline personality disorder patients (CGI-BPD) was the primary outcome measure, and other scales and self-reports related to affect, behavior, psychosis, general psychopathology domains, and clinical safety were included. RESULTS: Analysis of variance indicated no statistically significant differences between ziprasidone and placebo in the CGI-BPD. Nor were significant differences observed between groups in depressive, anxiety, psychotic, or impulsive symptoms. The mean daily dose of ziprasidone was 84.1 mg/day (SD = 54.8; range, 40-200). The drug was seen to be safe, and no serious adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSION: This trial failed to show a significant effect of ziprasidone in patients with borderline personality disorder. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00635921. [PubMed Citation] [Order full text from Infotrieve]

4) Tohen M, Bowden CL, Smulevich AB, Bergstrom R, Quinlan T, Osuntokun O, Wang WV, Oliff HS, Martenyi F, Kryzhanovskaya LA, Greil W
Olanzapine plus carbamazepine v. carbamazepine alone in treating manic episodes.
Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;192(2):135-43.
BACKGROUND: Combinations of olanzapine and carbamazepine are often used in clinical practice in the management of mania. AIMS: To assess the efficacy and safety of olanzapine plus carbamazepine in mixed and manic bipolar episodes. METHOD: Randomised, double-blind, 6-week trial of olanzapine (10-30 mg/day) plus carbamazepine (400-1200 mg/day; n=58) v. placebo plus carbamazepine (n=60) followed by open-label, 20-week olanzapine (10-30 mg/day) plus carbamazepine (400-1200 mg/day, n=86), with change in manic symptoms as main outcome measure. Safety and pharmacokinetics were also evaluated. RESULTS: There were no significant differences (baseline to endpoint) in efficacy measures between treatment groups, but at 6 weeks triglyceride levels were significantly higher (P=0.008) and potentially clinically significant weight gain (>or=7%) occurred more frequently (24.6% v. 3.4%, P=0.002) in the combined olanzapine and carbamazepine group. Carbamazepine reduced olanzapine concentrations but olanzapine had no effect on carbamazepine concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of olanzapine and carbamazepine did not have superior efficacy to carbamazepine alone. The increases in weight and triglycerides observed during combination treatment are a matter of concern. [PubMed Citation] [Order full text from Infotrieve]

5) Gao K, Ganocy SJ, Gajwani P, Muzina DJ, Kemp DE, Calabrese JR
A review of sensitivity and tolerability of antipsychotics in patients with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia: focus on somnolence.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;69(2):302-9.
OBJECTIVE: This study compared the sensitivity and tolerability of antipsychotics in patients with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. DATA SOURCES: English-language literature from January 1966 to December 2006 cited in MEDLINE was searched for the terms antipsychotics, typical antipsychotics, atypical antipsychotic, generic and brand names of antipsychotics, safety, tolerability, discontinuation due to adverse events, somnolence, and bipolar mania, bipolar depression, bipolar disorder, manic-depressive illness, or schizophrenia, randomized, double blind, and controlled clinical trial. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, monotherapy studies of anti-psychotics in both bipolar disorder and schizophrenia were prioritized. DATA EXTRACTION: Absolute risk increase (ARI) or reduction (ARR) and the numbers needed to treat to harm (NNTH) or benefit (NNTB) for the discontinuation due to adverse events and somnolence relative to placebo were estimated. DATA SYNTHESIS: Ten acute trials in mania, 3 in bipolar depression, and 8 in schizophrenia were identified, along with 2 maintenance studies in bipolar disorder and 2 in schizophrenia. In schizophrenia, ziprasidone caused significantly more discontinuations due to adverse events than placebo, with an NNTH of 19, while aripiprazole caused significantly fewer discontinuations due to adverse events than placebo, with an NNTB of 12. In mania, there was no statistically significant difference in discontinuation due to adverse events between antipsychotics and placebo. However, in bipolar depression, both quetiapine and olanzapine caused more discontinuations due to adverse events than placebo, with NNTHs of 7 and 24, respectively. All atypical antipsychotics caused a significantly greater incidence of somnolence than placebo in mania and depression, with NNTHs from 5 to 8 for mania and 2 to 6 for depression. In schizophrenia, only olanzapine, ziprasidone, and aripiprazole (NNTHs from 5 to 14) caused a significantly higher incidence of somnolence. There was no significant difference between schizophrenia and mania in the discontinuation due to adverse events or somnolence of all studied antipsychotics. However, there was a significantly higher incidence of discontinuation due to adverse events and somnolence caused by quetiapine in bipolar depression than that in schizophrenia or mania. CONCLUSION: Patients with bipolar disorder appear more sensitive to antipsychotics, and depressed patients are less tolerant to somnolence than those with either mania or schizophrenia. [PubMed Citation] [Order full text from Infotrieve]

6) Bowden CL, Edwards S, Evoniuk G
Open-label, concomitant use of lamotrigine and other medications for bipolar disorder.
CNS Spectr. 2008 Jan;13(1):75-83.
OBJECTIVE: A post-hoc, descriptive analysis was undertaken to assess the tolerability of and changes in psychiatric rating scales with lamotrigine (LTG) administered concomitantly with commonly prescribed bipolar medications. METHODS: During the 8- to 16-week, open-label, preliminary phase of two large clinical trials of patients (N=1,305) with bipolar I disorder, LTG was added to each patient's existing psychotropic regimen. Medications for acute symptoms could have been added and later discontinued to achieve LTG monotherapy. Data were compared for patients taking LTG with or without concomitant valproate, lithium, any atypical antipsychotic, or any selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. RESULTS: The percentages of patients with any reported adverse event and reported adverse events of mood symptoms or rash were comparable between those taking LTG with or without other concomitant bipolar medications. Adverse events in >10% of patients in at least one subgroup were headache, infection, nausea, rash, influenza, diarrhea, dizziness, and somnolence. Baseline scores on psychiatric rating scales improved similarly with LTG co-administered with other bipolar medications, and the pattern of results did not differ by baseline polarity of mood symptoms. CONCLUSION: LTG co-administered with valproate, lithium, an atypical antipsychotic, or a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor in the treatment of bipolar disorder seemed to be well tolerated and was associated with clinical improvement. [PubMed Citation] [Order full text from Infotrieve]

7) Thase ME, Jonas A, Khan A, Bowden CL, Wu X, McQuade RD, Carson WH, Marcus RN, Owen R
Aripiprazole monotherapy in nonpsychotic bipolar I depression: results of 2 randomized, placebo-controlled studies.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Feb;28(1):13-20.
Although most treatment research on bipolar disorder has focused on mania, depressive episodes occur more frequently among patients with bipolar disorder. Here, we report the results of 2 identically designed, 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies (CN138-096 and CN138-146) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole monotherapy in outpatients with bipolar I disorder experiencing a major depressive episode without psychotic features. Patients were randomized to placebo or aripiprazole (initiated at 10 mg/d, then flexibly dosed at 5-30 mg/d based on clinical effect and tolerability). The primary end point was mean change from baseline to Week 8 (last observation carried forward) in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale total score. In Studies 1 and 2, respectively, 186 and 187 patients were randomized to aripiprazole, and 188 and 188 to placebo. Although statistically significant differences were observed during Weeks 1 to 6, aripiprazole did not achieve statistical significance versus placebo at Week 8 in either study in the change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale total (primary end point). In addition, despite early statistical separation on the Clinical Global Impressions Bipolar Version Severity of Illness-Depression score (key secondary end point), aripiprazole was not superior to placebo at end point. Aripiprazole was associated with a higher incidence of akathisia, insomnia, nausea, fatigue, restlessness, and dry mouth versus placebo. More patients discontinued with aripiprazole versus placebo in Study 1 (46.8% vs 35.1%) and Study 2 (41.2% vs 29.8%). Aripiprazole monotherapy-as dosed in this study design-was not significantly more effective than placebo in the treatment of bipolar depression at end point (Week 8). [PubMed Citation] [Order full text from Infotrieve]

8) Nery FG, Monkul ES, Hatch JP, Fonseca M, Zunta-Soares GB, Frey BN, Bowden CL, Soares JC
Celecoxib as an adjunct in the treatment of depressive or mixed episodes of bipolar disorder: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2008 Mar;23(2):87-94.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the cox-2 inhibitor celecoxib has antidepressant effects in bipolar disorder (BD) patients during depressive or mixed phases. METHODS: We studied 28 DSM-IV BD patients who were experiencing a depressive or mixed episode and were on a stable dose of a mood stabilizer or atypical antipsychotic medication. Subjects were randomized to receive 6 weeks of double-blind placebo or celecoxib (400 mg/day) treatment. Current mood stabilizer or antipsychotic medication remained at the same doses during the trial. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analysis showed that the patients receiving celecoxib had lower Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HamD) scores after 1 week of treatment compared to the patients receiving placebo, but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.09). The improvement in the first week of treatment was statistically significant when the analysis included only the subjects who completed the full 6-week trial (p = 0.03). The two groups did not differ significantly on depressive or manic symptoms from the second week until the end of the trial. Celecoxib was well tolerated with the exception of two subjects who dropped out of the study due to rash. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that adjunctive treatment with celecoxib may produce a rapid-onset antidepressant effect in BD patients experiencing depressive or mixed episodes. [PubMed Citation] [Order full text from Infotrieve]

9) Li H, Ma C, Wang G, Zhu X, Peng M, Gu N
Response and remission rates in Chinese patients with bipolar mania treated for 4 weeks with either quetiapine or lithium: a randomized and double-blind study.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Jan;24(1):1-10.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine in Chinese patients hospitalized with acute bipolar mania. METHODS: This was a 4-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, lithium-controlled, parallel-group study. Secondary endpoints in the primary analysis were: response rate (> or = 50% decrease from baseline in YMRS total score) and remission rate as defined using 3 criteria: YMRS total score < or = 12, YMRS total score < or = 12 + MADRS total score < or = 8, and YMRS total score < or = 8. Other measures included: change from baseline at Day 28 in YMRS, PANSS, and MADRS total score. Adverse event (AE) data were collected throughout the study. RESULTS: 73 (94.8%) quetiapine and 62 (80.5%) lithium patients completed the study. Mean (SD) quetiapine doses for the ITT population and responders were 648.2 (111.84)mg/day and 637.5 (118.78)mg/day, respectively, while mean lithium concentrations for the ITT population and responders were 0.80 (0.28)mmol/L and 0.80 (0.22)mmol/L, respectively. Of patients who responded to quetiapine at Day 28, 88.3% were receiving 600-800mg/day. At Day 28 YMRS response rate was significantly greater with quetiapine than lithium (77.9% vs. 59.7%, p = 0.0132), and remission rates using the 3 criteria were significantly greater with quetiapine than lithium: YMRS total score < or = 12 (70.1% vs. 48.1%, p = 0.0071), YMRS < or = 12 + MADRS < or = 8 (70.1% vs. 48.1%; p = 0.0071), and YMRS < or = 8 (51.9% vs. 32.5%; p = 0.0147). Significant decreases were observed in PANSS, YMRS, and MADRS total scores for both groups. The most common AEs experienced by patients receiving quetiapine were constipation, dizziness, diarrhea, alanine aminotransferase increase, palpitations, aspartate aminotransferase increase, pharyngolaryngeal pain, upper respiratory tract infection and dry mouth. In patients receiving lithium, the most common AEs were nausea (16.9%), constipation (13.0%), vomiting (13.0%), nasopharyngitis (11.7%), dizziness (6.5%), diarrhea (6.5%), and upper respiratory tract infection (6.5%). CONCLUSION: Quetiapine was shown to be clinically effective in patients with acute bipolar mania. There were side effects with quetiapine similar to those reported in other studies that included other ethnic populations of patients. [PubMed Citation] [Order full text from Infotrieve]

10) Keck PE, Calabrese JR, McIntyre RS, McQuade RD, Carson WH, Eudicone JM, Carlson BX, Marcus RN, Sanchez R
Aripiprazole monotherapy for maintenance therapy in bipolar I disorder: a 100-week, double-blind study versus placebo.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;68(10):1480-91.
OBJECTIVE: A 26-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled relapse prevention study of aripiprazole was designed a priori with a prospective, 74-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled extension phase. Efficacy and tolerability of aripiprazole for relapse prevention in bipolar I disorder was, therefore, evaluated for 100 weeks. METHOD: Patients with DSM-IV bipolar I disorder, recent manic or mixed episode, received open-label aripiprazole 15 or 30 mg/day (started at 30 mg/day) for 6 to 18 weeks. Patients achieving stabilization (Young Mania Rating Scale score or= 5% incidence and twice placebo rate) were tremor, akathisia, dry mouth, hypertension, weight gain, vaginitis, abnormal thinking, pharyngitis, and flu syndrome. Mean weight change from baseline to 100 weeks (last observation carried forward) was +0.4 +/- 0.8 kg with aripiprazole and -1.9 +/- 0.8 kg with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Over a 100-week treatment period, aripiprazole monotherapy was effective for relapse prevention in patients who were initially stabilized on aripiprazole for 6 consecutive weeks, and it maintained a good safety and tolerability profile. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00036348. [PubMed Citation] [Order full text from Infotrieve]

11) Zarzar MN, Graham J, Roberts J, Thompson T, Nanry K
Effectiveness and weight effects of open-label lamotrigine with and without concomitant psychotropic medications in patients with bipolar I disorder.
MedGenMed. 2007;9(2):41.
BACKGROUND: Approximately half of all patients with diagnosed bipolar disorder are prescribed 2 or more psychotropic medications. Lamotrigine was approved in 2003 for the maintenance treatment of bipolar I disorder. This study examined comparative effects of lamotrigine with and without concomitant medications. METHODS: A post hoc analysis of data from a prospective, open-label study of lamotrigine in 1175 patients with bipolar I disorder evaluated the clinical response to and quality-of-life and weight effects of lamotrigine as monotherapy and in patients receiving concomitant valproate, lithium, antipsychotics, or antidepressants. The study was originally designed to assess the rate of rash among patients instructed to use specific dermatologic precautions compared with those receiving usual care. Lamotrigine was administered for 12 weeks, including a 5-week titration, with target dose of 200 mg/d, adjusted as necessary for concomitant medication(s). Evaluations at baseline and week 12 included the severity component of the Clinical Global Impression-Bipolar Version scale, the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form, and weight and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: Efficacy data were available for 1139 patients. Symptoms and quality-of-life mean scores improved following treatment in all patient groups. Quality-of-life scores improved significantly more in patients not receiving than in those receiving concomitant antipsychotics. There were no changes in weight or BMI after lamotrigine monotherapy or adjuvant therapy. Most patients were satisfied with lamotrigine treatment. CONCLUSION: Lamotrigine was effective and well tolerated and appeared to have no effect on body weight when given as monotherapy or as adjunctive therapy with valproate, antipsychotics, lithium, or antidepressants to outpatients with bipolar I disorder in a 12-week open-label study. [Free Full Text] [PubMed Citation] [Order full text from Infotrieve]

12) Yatham LN, Fallu A, Binder CE
A 6-month randomized open-label comparison of continuation of oral atypical antipsychotic therapy or switch to long acting injectable risperidone in patients with bipolar disorder.
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 2007;(434):50-6.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and effectiveness of long-acting injectable risperidone (LAI-ris) add-on in bipolar patients. METHOD: A 6-month, open-label, randomized, pilot trial enrolled 49 bipolar out-patients who were taking a mood stabilizer and an atypical antipsychotic (AAP). Patients were maintained on a mood stabilizer and were randomized to continuation of their current AAP or switched to LAI-ris treatment. Safety outcomes included adverse events and changes in vital signs, laboratory tests and extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). Effectiveness measures included Clinical Global Impression-Severity, scales assessing mania, depression, anxiety, resource utilization, quality of life, subject satisfaction with treatment, and time to intervention. RESULTS: Twenty-three subjects were randomized to LAI-ris and 26 to oral AAP. There were no significant differences between the groups in adverse events, EPS change scores, weight or other safety measures. LAI-ris group had significant reductions in symptoms as measured by changes in Clinical Global Impression-Severity scores and Young Mania Rating Scale at endpoint relative to baseline and oral AAP group had reductions in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale scores relative to baseline but no significant differences were noted between the groups on any of the efficacy measures. CONCLUSION: LAI-ris demonstrated similar effectiveness, safety and tolerability compared to oral AAP in this 6 month pilot trial. [PubMed Citation] [Order full text from Infotrieve]

13) Tramontina S, Zeni CP, Pheula GF, de Souza CK, Rohde LA
Aripiprazole in juvenile bipolar disorder comorbid with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: an open clinical trial.
CNS Spectr. 2007 Oct;12(10):758-62.
INTRODUCTION: Juvenile bipolar disorder (JBD) is a highly impairing chronic mental health condition that affects children and adolescents' overall functioning. Comorbidity with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is extremely prevalent and may determine worse response to treatment. Few investigations have addressed the use of recent atypical antipsychotics in JBD, although several guidelines suggest their use. METHODS: We conducted a 6-week open trial with aripiprazole in 10 children and adolescents with JBD comorbid with ADHD to assess impact on mania and ADHD symptoms, respectively, by means of the Young Mania Rating Scale and the Swanson, Nolan and Pelham Scale, as well as on global functioning (Clinical Global Impressions-Severity), and adverse events. RESULTS: Significant improvement in global functioning scores (F=3.17, P=.01, effect size=0.55), manic symptoms (F=5.63, P<.01; ES=0.93), and ADHD symptoms (t=3.42, P<.01;ES=1.05) were detected. Although an overall positive tolerability was reported, significant weight gain (F=3.07, P=.05) was observed. CONCLUSION: Aripiprazole was effective in improving mania and ADHD symptoms, but neither JBD nor ADHD symptom remission was observed in most of the cases. Randomized placebo-controlled trials for JBD and ADHD are needed. [PubMed Citation] [Order full text from Infotrieve]

14) Suppes T, Eudicone J, McQuade R, Pikalov A, Carlson B
Efficacy and safety of aripiprazole in subpopulations with acute manic or mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder.
J Affect Disord. 2008 Apr;107(1-3):145-54.
BACKGROUND: This analysis was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole compared with placebo in subpopulations of patients with acute manic or mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder. METHODS: Acutely manic patients experiencing DSM-IV manic/mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder were pooled from two randomized, three-week, flexible-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (N=516) and stratified by disease severity (Young Mania Rating Scale, YMRS), episode type, presence or absence of psychotic features, episode frequency, age, gender, and baseline severity of depressive symptoms. Safety and treatment-emergent adverse-event analyses were also performed. RESULTS: Aripiprazole significantly reduced mean YMRS total scores at end point compared with placebo in patients with more severe or less severe illness, with mixed or manic episodes, with or without psychotic features, or with a history of rapid or non-rapid cycling (p<0.01 for each subpopulation); in men and women (p=0.001 for both); in patients in the 18-40 and 41-55 year age groups (por=5% of patients aged 18-40 years receiving aripiprazole were similar to those reported for the overall population. LIMITATIONS: This post hoc analysis utilized pooled data from two short-term studies. CONCLUSION: Efficacy of the second-generation antipsychotic aripiprazole was noted across a broad range of subpopulations often associated with treatment resistance in patients experiencing manic or mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder. [PubMed Citation] [Order full text from Infotrieve]

15) Tohen M, Kryzhanovskaya L, Carlson G, Delbello M, Wozniak J, Kowatch R, Wagner K, Findling R, Lin D, Robertson-Plouch C, Xu W, Dittmann RW, Biederman J
Olanzapine versus placebo in the treatment of adolescents with bipolar mania.
Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;164(10):1547-56.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of olanzapine for the treatment of acute manic or mixed episodes associated with bipolar disorder in adolescents. METHOD: A 3-week multicenter, parallel, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial was conducted at 24 sites in the United States and two sites in Puerto Rico. The participants were outpatient and inpatient male and female adolescents 13-17 years of age with an acute manic or mixed episode. Subjects received either olanzapine (2.5-20 mg/day [N=107]) or placebo (N=54). The mean change from baseline to endpoint in the Young Mania Rating Scale total score was the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: The mean baseline-to-endpoint change in the Young Mania Rating Scale total score was significantly greater for patients receiving olanzapine relative to patients receiving placebo, and a greater proportion of olanzapine-treated patients met response and remission criteria (44.8% versus 18.5% and 35.2% versus 11.1%, respectively). The mean baseline-to-endpoint weight change was significantly greater for patients receiving olanzapine relative to patients receiving placebo (3.7 kg versus 0.3 kg), and the incidence of treatment-emergent weight gain > or =7% of baseline was higher for olanzapine-treated patients (41.9% versus 1.9%). The mean baseline-to-endpoint changes in prolactin, fasting glucose, fasting total cholesterol, uric acid, and the hepatic enzymes aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase were significantly greater in patients treated with olanzapine relative to patients receiving placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Olanzapine was effective in the treatment of bipolar mania in adolescent patients. Patients treated with olanzapine, however, had significantly greater weight gain and increases in the levels of hepatic enzymes, prolactin, fasting glucose, fasting total cholesterol, and uric acid. [PubMed Citation] [Order full text from Infotrieve]

16) Harvey PD, Hassman H, Mao L, Gharabawi GM, Mahmoud RA, Engelhart LM
Cognitive functioning and acute sedative effects of risperidone and quetiapine in patients with stable bipolar I disorder: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Aug;68(8):1186-94.
OBJECTIVE: Antipsychotic medications differ in their sedative potential, which can affect cognitive performance. The primary objective of this double-blind study was to compare the effects of treatment initiation with risperidone and quetiapine on cognitive function in subjects with stable bipolar disorder. METHOD: Subjects had a DSM-IV diagnosis of bipolar I disorder in partial or full remission and a Young Mania Rating Scale score [PubMed Citation] [Order full text from Infotrieve]

17) Smith LA, Cornelius V, Warnock A, Tacchi MJ, Taylor D
Pharmacological interventions for acute bipolar mania: a systematic review of randomized placebo-controlled trials.
Bipolar Disord. 2007 Sep;9(6):551-60.
OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials in acute bipolar mania to summarize available data on drug treatment of mania. METHODS: We included trials of medications licensed in the USA or UK for the treatment of any phase of bipolar disorder. Outcomes investigated were changes in mania scores, attrition, extrapyramidal effects and weight change. Data were combined through meta-analyses. RESULTS: We included 13 studies (involving 3,089 subjects) and identified 2 studies for each of the following medications: carbamazepine, haloperidol, lithium, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, valproate semisodium and aripiprazole. All drugs showed significant benefit compared with placebo for reduction in mania scores. Compared with placebo, for all antipsychotics pooled, response to treatment (> or =50% reduction in Young Mania Rating Scale scores) was increased more than 1.7 times [relative risk (RR) = 1.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.54, 1.96]; for all mood stabilizers pooled, response to treatment was doubled (RR 2.01, 95% CI = 1.66, 2.43). Overall withdrawals were 34% fewer (24-43%) with antipsychotics, and 26% fewer (10-39%) with mood stabilizers. However, for carbamazepine, aripiprazole and lithium an increase in risk of withdrawal could not be excluded. Small but significant increases in extrapyramidal side effects occurred with risperidone and aripiprazole. CONCLUSIONS: Antipsychotics and mood stabilizers are significantly more effective than placebo for the treatment of acute mania. Their effect sizes are similar. Small differences between effect sizes may be due to differences in the patients included in the studies or to chance. Carbamazepine and lithium may be more poorly tolerated, and antipsychotics cause more extrapyramidal side effects. [PubMed Citation] [Order full text from Infotrieve]

18) Biederman J, Mick E, Spencer T, Doyle R, Joshi G, Hammerness P, Kotarski M, Aleardi M, Wozniak J
An open-label trial of aripiprazole monotherapy in children and adolescents with bipolar disorder.
CNS Spectr. 2007 Sep;12(9):683-9.
INTRODUCTION: Aripiprazole is a novel second-generation antipsychotic approved for the treatment of bipolar disorder in adults but there is no systematic data available in pediatric bipolar disorder. METHODS: This was an 8-week, open-label, prospective study of aripiprazole 9.4+/-4.2 mg/day monotherapy to assess the efficacy and tolerability of this compound in treating pediatric bipolar disorder. Assessments included the Young Mania Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale, and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Adverse events were assessed through spontaneous self-reports, vital signs weight monitoring, and laboratory analysis. RESULTS: Fifteen of the 19 bipolar youth (79%) completed the study. Aripiprazole treatment was associated with clinically and statistically significant improvement in mean Young Mania Rating Scale scores (-18.0+/-6.9, P<.0001). With the important exception of two cases of extrapyramidal symptoms that precipitated dropout, aripiprazole was well tolerated with no statistically significant increase in body weight (1.8+/-1.7 kg, P=.2). CONCLUSION: Open-label aripiprazole treatment was beneficial in the treatment of mania in youth with bipolar disorder. Future placebo-controlled, double-blind studies are warranted. [PubMed Citation] [Order full text from Infotrieve]

19) Miklowitz DJ, Otto MW, Frank E, Reilly-Harrington NA, Kogan JN, Sachs GS, Thase ME, Calabrese JR, Marangell LB, Ostacher MJ, Patel J, Thomas MR, Araga M, Gonzalez JM, Wisniewski SR
Intensive psychosocial intervention enhances functioning in patients with bipolar depression: results from a 9-month randomized controlled trial.
Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Sep;164(9):1340-7.
OBJECTIVE: Psychosocial interventions are effective adjuncts to pharmacotherapy in delaying recurrences of bipolar disorder; however, to date their effects on life functioning have been given little attention. In a randomized trial, the authors examined the impact of intensive psychosocial treatment plus pharmacotherapy on the functional outcomes of patients with bipolar disorder over the 9 months following a depressive episode. METHOD: Participants were 152 depressed outpatients with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder in the multisite Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD) study. All patients received pharmacotherapy. Eighty-four patients were randomly assigned to intensive psychosocial intervention (30 sessions over 9 months of interpersonal and social rhythm therapy, cognitive behavior therapy [CBT], or family-focused therapy), and 68 patients were randomly assigned to collaborative care (a 3-session psychoeducational treatment). Independent evaluators rated the four subscales of the Longitudinal Interval Follow-Up Evaluation-Range of Impaired Functioning Tool (LIFE-RIFT) (relationships, satisfaction with activities, work/role functioning, and recreational activities) through structured interviews given at baseline and every 3 months over a 9-month period. RESULTS: Patients in intensive psychotherapy had better total functioning, relationship functioning, and life satisfaction scores over 9 months than patients in collaborative care, even after pretreatment functioning and concurrent depression scores were covaried. No effects of psychosocial intervention were observed on work/role functioning or recreation scores during this 9-month period. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive psychosocial treatment enhances relationship functioning and life satisfaction among patients with bipolar disorder. Alternate interventions focused on the specific cognitive deficits of individuals with bipolar disorder may be necessary to enhance vocational functioning after a depressive episode. [PubMed Citation] [Order full text from Infotrieve]

20) Schenkel LS, Pavuluri MN, Herbener ES, Harral EM, Sweeney JA
Facial emotion processing in acutely ill and euthymic patients with pediatric bipolar disorder.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007 Aug;46(8):1070-9.
OBJECTIVE: Past investigations indicate facial emotion-processing abnormalities in pediatric bipolar disorder (PBD) subjects. However, the extent to which these deficits represent state- and trait-related factors is unclear. We investigated facial affect processing in acutely ill and clinically stabilized children with PBD and matched healthy subjects. METHOD: Subjects (N = 86) consisted of unmedicated/acutely ill (n = 29) and medicated/clinically stabilized (n = 29) PBD youths and matched healthy subjects (n = 28) who completed tasks of facial affect identification and differentiation. RESULTS: Subjects with PBD, regardless of clinical and treatment status, showed marked impairments in the ability to correctly identify emotionally intense happy and sad facial expressions, with both groups tending to misjudge extreme facial expressions as being moderate to mild in intensity. However, when differentiating subtle variations of happy or sad expressions, only unmedicated/acutely ill PBD patients performed more poorly than healthy subjects. Younger age at onset was associated with more impaired emotion processing only in the PBD sample. PBD subjects with comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) performed more poorly than subjects without ADHD when processing sad facial expressions, but not happy ones. CONCLUSIONS: This study found evidence of both state-of-illness and trait-related deficits in emotion processing in PBD. Treatments are needed to better reduce this impairment and to reduce its developmental impact on interpersonal functioning. [PubMed Citation] [Order full text from Infotrieve]